TestFly’s Start Smart, Scale Strategically, Win Big Methodology
Step 1: Identify a High-Impact Starting Point
AI integration starts with something simple, visible, and high-frequency - typically, a task that is repetitive, data-rich, and takes valuable time away from human testers. We have provided examples of typical AI areas below as use cases.
Use Case: Automating Smoke Tests as we begin with the basics:
Automating game startup, menu navigation, level loading, and shutdown
Using rule-based or computer vision models to confirm successful operations
Measuring the number of successful and failed test cycles handled by AI versus manual testers
Why this works:
Low technical barrier to entry
Quick measurable wins
Builds confidence with devs and producers
Opens the path for automated regression testing
Critical Success Factors:
Percentage of smoke tests automated
Time saved per test run
Accuracy of AI-detected issues vs. manual detection
Team adoption rate and feedback from developers
Step 2: Use Early Wins to Build Momentum
Once the AI automation proves itself, we capitalize on the results. Teams share key metrics (e.g., “smoke tests now take 4 minutes vs. 20”), gather cross-functional feedback, and iterate fast. This momentum builds stakeholder trust and clears the way for more advanced tooling. We have provided examples of typical AI areas below as use cases.
Use Case: Regression Suite Expansion
Build upon the initial smoke test automation to expand into broader regression coverage
Automate high-priority gameplay sequences and system checks
Why this works:
Builds on already validated processes
Encourages wider team collaboration
Creates momentum for future AI investment
Populates data for ML processing
Critical Success Factors:
Increase in automated regression test coverage
Reduction in manual testing effort across builds
Reduction in escaped bugs (bugs found post-release)
Speed of QA cycle turnaround
Step 3: Expand Into Smart, Scalable AI Use Cases
With a solid foundation, we guide clients into deeper AI territory; we have provided examples of typical AI areas below as use cases:
Use Case 1: AI-Driven Level Completion Testing
Rule-based or ML agents auto-play through levels
Monitor player flow, transitions, and critical path coverage
Flag bugs like geometry issues, loading stalls, and softlocks
Why this works:
Scales testing efficiently without requiring manual playthroughs
Increases confidence in level design and progression
Critical Success Factors:
Number of levels successfully auto-played
Bugs discovered by AI agents vs. humans
Time reduction in full level test passes
Use Case 2: Reinforcement Learning for Edge-Case Discovery
AI agents learn by doing, improving with each run
Simulate unpredictable player behavior
Surface hard-to-reach bugs or exploitable paths
Why this works:
Identifies edge cases humans may not anticipate
Improves overall game robustness
Critical Success Factors:
Number of unique edge-case bugs discovered
Reusability of learned AI test agents across builds
Developer prioritization of AI-found issues
Use Case 3: Natural Language Processing for Bug Triage
NLP models auto-tag bug reports by severity, area, or duplication
Prioritize issues for devs, reducing manual triage overhead
Why this works:
Reduces QA triage time significantly
Ensures critical bugs are surfaced faster
Critical Success Factors:
Time saved in bug triage process
Reduction in misclassified or duplicate bug reports
Accuracy of NLP prioritization compared to human QA
Step 4: Mature the AI QA Ecosystem
By now, AI has earned its place in your QA pipeline. The final step is integration and we have provided examples of typical AI areas below as use cases:
Use Case: Predictive QA and Autonomous Testing Agents
Sync AI systems with CI/CD pipelines to enable real-time quality insights
Leverage live player telemetry and in-game analytics to dynamically guide test focus
Deploy autonomous AI agents that adaptively test high-risk areas based on prediction models
Use machine learning to forecast bug clusters, progression blockers, or balance issues before they surface
Why this works:
Proactively enhances QA coverage by anticipating where bugs are likely to occur
Enables continuous testing cycles with AI that scales alongside development
Reduces reliance on rigid, pre-scripted test plans by allowing agents to explore adaptively
Critical Success Factors:
Accuracy of predicted defect areas vs. actual in-game issues
Rate of coverage increase from autonomous agents
Reduction in testing blind spots
Speed and reliability of integration with CI/CD environments
Time from prediction to actionable test plan updates